Getting the strategy right
The effects of climate change are already visible. They are not abstract models; they are an operational reality that is already affecting infrastructure on a daily basis. For example, rising temperatures can reduce the lifespan of some airfield pavements by 25% within ten years. This fundamentally alters maintenance strategies, renewal planning and budgeting.
For airport operators, the difficulty lies in the time horizon. Their role naturally involves short-term management, focused on maintaining operational continuity. However, climate hazards must now be analysed across multiple timeframes. According to projections by the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), some regions may experience increased rainfall in the short term, followed by a decline over the longer term. Without this multi-scale understanding, operators risk over-adapting their infrastructure – in other words, overinvesting in solutions that are effective today but obsolete tomorrow. And over- or under-adaptation can be very costly.
Beyond climate data, the challenge is above all to provide a short- and long-term vision, aligned with day-to-day management and fully integrated with operational constraints. The objective is to support informed decision-making and effective trade-offs in planning, investment and maintenance, ensuring an appropriate level of service under evolving climatic conditions.
To support this approach, a dedicated climate resilience methodology is essential because it turns anticipation into a strategic and actionable lever.
Collaborative development
An adaptation strategy is only effective and credible if it is designed collectively. A “closed-door” approach between experts leads to overly theoretical assessments that are disconnected from operational realities. Conversely, a diagnosis based solely on field knowledge often underestimates future developments.
Collaborative development with airport operational and environmental teams enables the integration of technical realities, day-to-day uses and site-specific constraints. To gain a broader perspective on territorial challenges beyond aeronautical activities, nearby operators (of rail and road networks) should also be involved, alongside public authorities when dealing with risks such as wildfires or hydrological events, which are often external to the infrastructure itself. By engaging in a collective dynamic with both institutional and private stakeholders, the approach strengthens overall regional resilience in anticipating and managing extreme climate events, while also sharing responsibility.
Working collaboratively with operators brings detailed knowledge of the site, including past incidents, recurring weak points, sensitive areas, and operational constraints. It is the teams themselves who know which terminals are most exposed during heatwaves, where water accumulates on runways during extreme Mediterranean storms, or how long it takes to return to normal operations after snowfall. This feedback transforms a macro-climatic analysis into a precise, actionable and prioritised assessment.
Once these observations are consolidated, technical expertise enhances the diagnosis by taking into account:
- potential aggravating factors, like ageing infrastructure, existing degradation, or materials in use,
- specific exposure to hazards, and
- functional impacts, like service interruptions, flight delays or cancellations.
The adaptation solutions resulting from this collective intelligence process are more relevant, as they are based on a shared diagnosis and a common understanding of priorities. The example of Lyon–Saint-Exupéry Airport, operated by VINCI Airports, illustrates this approach.